Today we are going to talk about clubs that are essentially holding players back from higher level opportunities.
I think it's ironic to hear team
owners complain about the red-tape and hassle of calling up a Tier III player
during the season then hear the same guys not want to send another player up to
the United States Hockey League.
This is yet another situation where
USA Hockey has allowed the wallets to retard natural development. Here's an
example of how it really should be.
One of the European advisers sends a
young Swiss player to a club with a single team in a tier III league. The
player arrives a week before the start of the season, speaks minimal English,
but proves in practice to obviously be a very skillful player.
During the first game, the Swiss kid
hits the switches and lights the lamp six times while getting another four
points with assists. Everybody in the building can see that this player does
not belong in the league.
The tier III coach knows a guy that
knows a NAHL coach and within days, the young talent is on practice ice with
his new team. The Swiss kid continues to light the lamp, but at a slower rate,
and amasses 30 points over the next ten games.
Like the tier III coach before him, the
NAHL bench boss has a decent relationship with a USHL coach and before you know
it, the player manages to accumulate in excess of a hundred USHL points to close
the season. Ultimately, the phenom gets picked in the first round of the NHL
draft and lives the American dream.
That's the way it should work...but it
does not because there are tremendous clogs in the system. Most of those clogs
are caused by ego and greed. Coaches and team owners get too caught up in
winning and the money grab to allow a player to bolt up the developmental
ladder. The situation has become so ridicules that there are good hockey people
questioning if the system is functional at all.
How can we fix it? USA Hockey needs
to step in and create a player acquisition system that is functional.
- Higher level teams
can call up lower level players at any time (players enrolled at traditional schools are moved
at semester breaks only). The lower level team must allow players to move up for trial assignments. At the time
the player is rostered for a sixth game, the higher level club must pay the
lower level club $1,000. The player must return to the lower level team
in the event he is dropped from the higher level team's active roster during
the current season unless. The lower level team also has the right to waive the
standard fee at any time.
There are a number of NAHL owners
that would jump off a bridge before agreeing to such a policy.
In the end, a change of policy would be in the best interest of creating a true
developmental system within the level of play. But that's just my opinion, what's
* Disclaimer: This site may contain advice, opinions and statements from various authors and information providers. Views expressed in this article reflect the personal opinion of the author, Stephen Heisler, and not necessarily the views of JuniorHockey.ca. JuniorHockey.ca does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement or other info provided in the article, or from any other member of this site.